85 #s and 1:45 was my fastest. Which is good considering that for half the time I thought we wanted a higher number on the row split. Silly me.
100#1:45
100# (did 105# for two sets, but kept splitting the HPC)1:35
is it time for you to make a nutrition change?http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fiw-taco-bell-20110125,0,1727925.story
125#, 1:33. So close to 135!!
165#1:12
95#, 1:46
105#, 1:36
185# and 1:13
215# (failed on the hpc with 225#) and 1:20 on the 500m split on the rower.
215# and 1:15 on the 500m split
70#, 1:52
135#, 1:31
85 #s and 1:45 was my fastest. Which is good considering that for half the time I thought we wanted a higher number on the row split. Silly me.
ReplyDelete100#
ReplyDelete1:45
100# (did 105# for two sets, but kept splitting the HPC)
ReplyDelete1:35
is it time for you to make a nutrition change?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.latimes.com/business/la-fiw-taco-bell-20110125,0,1727925.story
125#, 1:33. So close to 135!!
ReplyDelete165#
ReplyDelete1:12
95#, 1:46
ReplyDelete105#, 1:36
ReplyDelete185# and 1:13
ReplyDelete215# (failed on the hpc with 225#) and 1:20 on the 500m split on the rower.
ReplyDelete215# and 1:15 on the 500m split
ReplyDelete70#, 1:52
ReplyDelete135#, 1:31
ReplyDelete